Archaeological trends and the book of mormon origins byu. I have no idea about the archaeological evidence for the existence of book of mormon at least some years ago. Wayne mays twopart presentation at the november 20 vernal, ut book of mormon evidence conference. Is there any archeological evidence that the events in the. Matheny at the 1984 sunstone theological symposium in salt lake city.
Claims book of mormon archaeology is based upon scant evidence is deception for the masses. At least they are not wed in reality since no book of mormon location is known with reference to modern topography. Proof that the book of mormon is true, excerpt from. Dec 12, 2007 therefore, there is a consensus from professional archaeologists, mormon and non mormon alike, that there is no specific confirmation of the book of mormon from archaeology. Matheny, speech at sunstone symposium 6, book of mormon archaeology august 25, 1984. It is a common claim by critics that there is absolutely no archaeological evidence to support the book of mormon. One good example would be codex sinaiticus estimated to be created about 350 years after christ. The book of mormon makes a handful of references to horses existing on the american continents in these ancient times. Because of the everincreasing evidence, we are committed to finding tangible proof that should convert the most critical doubter of the history of the book of mormon. Two of the most prevalent claims for the book of mormon are, there is much archaeological proof to the book of mormon, and the american indians are descendants of israelites who came to america as described in the book of mormon. Wayne has teamed up with air data solutions to put drones in the sky to provide a detailed 3d map of the already evident earthworks and walls that are found in many areas close. Therefore, the mormon can have confidence that the bible. Sorensons groundbreaking book, an ancient american setting for the book of mormon, published in 1985.
Historians date abrahams biblical story around 2000 b. If they were once a delightsome people and had christ for their shepherd, mormon 5. How a mormon lawyer transformed archaeology in mexicoand. And so this is a kingsize kind of problem, it seems to me, for the socalled book of mormon archaeology.
The aztec, maya, and inca people were expecting the return of a god who their ancestors once believed in. If the book of mormon is really true history, then even after 1500 years, there should be some evidence that would support the truthfulness of those historical scriptural events, as recorded in the book of mormon. Before we begin, i want to mention a few things to help you understand our presentation. Book of mormon archaeology in north america book of mormon. Occasionally, they will promote some type of archaeological artifact that is similar to something built or written by hebrew people to try to validate their claim that the book of mormon people were indeed from the land of israel. Many a learned person has asked the same thing about the bible or even the existence of god. Many readers have posed this question, both out of genuine interest and also as. Let us not forget that the lds church has provided no historical or archaeological evidence that nephi or any of the unique characters mentioned in the book of mormon actually lived. He established the new world archaeological foundation. Archaeology is in fact, physical evidence that supports the truthfulness of a historical event. Let the debate continue, but let all the evidence be admitted.
Though the nwaf failed to establish book of mormon archaeology, the archaeological investigations of nwafsponsored projects were a success for ancient american archaeology in general which has been recognized and appreciated by nonmormon archaeologists. Thomas stuart ferguson thomas ferguson wrote three books defending the mormon faith. Not only have cement structures been identified throughout mesoamerica, but as dr. His library research spurred his first hunt for archaeological evidence. The book of mormon describes migrations of people from the middle east to central america, and further describes some features of their civilizations in the new world. Full text of recollections of fifty years in the ministry.
Is there any archaeological evidence for the book of mormon. Ancient israelites did come to america over 2400 years ago. Proof that the book of mormon is true book of mormon facts. Recent archaeological evidence has shown that military fortifications around mesoamerican cities were, in fact, fairly common, and that the type of construction described in the book of mormon is completely consistent with what evidence shows. As we begin to explore mormon archaeology, it seems appropriate to introduce the fascinating history of thomas ferguson, an attorney by trade, whose true passion manifest as an amateur archaeologist who dedicated decades of his life to the search for evidence to validate the book of mormon as a historical record. In abrahams time, ur was one of the great citystates in sumer, a part of the fertile crescent located from the tigris and euphrates rivers in iraq to the. Some archaeological evidences for the book of mormon. It is also important to note that nihm is believed to be a tribal name, not a place name, and that the three consonants can have a variety of spellings when vowels. Archaeology and the book of mormonarchive 7 wikipedia. Non mormon archaeologists speak on book of mormon evidence.
Archaeological evidence for 7 locations on lehis journey. This is clear in any other reproduction of the uncle sam figure. Archaeological evidence about the biblical story of abraham. Oct 25, 2008 it appears that the book of mormon had no place in the new world whatsoever. This, of course, is not to imply that there are no problems connected with biblical archaeology, or that archaeological evidence alone can prove the bible to be divinely inspired. Discussion regarding the historicity of the book of mormon often focuses on archaeological issues, some of which relate to the large size and the long time span of the civilizations mentioned in the book. The first myth that we need to eliminate is that book of mormon archaeology exists. While there is still much to learn about the people and stories in the book of mormon, some of the best archaeological evidence to support the book of mormon comes from lehis journey to the. Come see a live presentation on archaeological discoveries and their correlation to the book of mormon cultures. Lost civilizations of north america documentary4, deborah bolnick on haplogroup x. Hunter of the first council of the seventy is a book of tremendous interest and value for those who would know firsthand the traditions and folkways of the early inhabitants of north, central, and south america as well as know the truth contained in the book of mormon concerning these peoples. The scientific search for nephite remains mormons in. For one particular physical evidence, look no further than a plethora of archaeological sites from many different centuries, but particularly.
Jerry grovers book, which uses geological principles to explain the occurrence of natural events in the book of mormon, is not as widely known. The purpose of this article is to shed some light on not only the subject of archaeology, but also on the reality of both biblical and book of mormon archaeology. There is absolutely no archaeological evidence to directly support the book of mormon or the nephites and lamanites, who were supposed to have numbered in the millions. The book of mormon begins in a wellknown location, jerusalem, in 600 b. Archaeological proof of the book of mormon lds blogs. But those of the book of mormon, they insist, are not. Mar 10, 2020 archaeology supporting the historicity of the book of mormon. According to joseph smith and subsequent presidents and apostles of the lds church, the geographical extent of book of mormon lands included virtually all of north and south america. When they say directly support, they typically mean that they are looking for a direct corroboration, such as the presence of the name nephi or zarahemla in association with ancient. Five compelling archeological evidences for the book of mormon. In this post i wanted to emphasize physical evidencesstuff you can touch, see, feel.
Brigham young university byu is owned by the mormon church and has a department of professional archaeologists who are dedicated to archaeology as it pertains to the book of mormon. Archaeological evidence and the book of mormon fairmormon. When they say directly support, they typically mean that they are looking for a direct corroboration, such as the presence of the name nephi or zarahemla in association with. These professionals, who are practicing mormons, are to be applauded for their honesty. There is no archaeological evidence for the book of mormon. We can prove, though that the jews were great record keepers. Archaeology itself can be divided and subdivided into numerous disciplines. First published in 1830, the book of mormon tells of the transoceanic migrations of two ancient near eastern peoples to the americas. Though argument does not create conviction, lack of it destroys belief.
See more ideas about archaeology, book of mormon and mound builders. Book of mormon evidence in american archaeology wayne may. We cannot imperically prove that everything in the bible is correct. Today we will talk about some common criticisms of the book of mormon around archaeological evidence that some say proves or disproves the truthfulness of the book of mormon. No evidence has been found in the new world for a ferrous metallurgical industry dating to precolumbian times. The scientific trend of archaeological evidence of its historic facticity indicates that the book of mormon is what joseph smith claimed it wasan ancient book. Proof the book of mormon isnt true the book of mormon contradicts the bible and was actually a work of fiction written by joseph smith in the 1800s, who copied much of it from the king james version, trying to make it look like an ancient manuscript. T he book of mormon is advertized by the church of jesus christ of latterday saints as another testament of jesus christ and specifically of the account of his supposed visit to the american continent the book of mormon, 3 nephi 11. This is another in my series of article on challenging questions that missionaries will likely face. For years, mormons have been looking for archaeological evidence to support their book of mormon. Supporting evidences of the book of mormon are broadly identifiable. The national geographic society has a similar letter.
According to the church of jesus christ of latterday saints mormon church, the book of mormon is a divinely inspired revelation that is complimentary to the bible. Jun 09, 2017 illuminating the credibility of the book of mormon through archaeological photographs. And to be less sardonic about the matter, this is also why direct evidence actually can sometimes di. I couldnt possibly cover every book of mormon correlation in one sitting. The scientific search for nephite remains mormons in transition. Bpin the last part in this series, we saw that the bible is reliable, being textually pure and verifiably accurate in many places. Between these two views is the view held by some latter day saints that the book of mormon is a divine work of a spiritual nature, written in ancient america, but that its purpose is to teach of christ and not to be used as a guide for history, geology, archaeology, or anthropology.
Illuminating the credibility of the book of mormon through archaeological photographs. And so this is a kingsize problem, it seems to me, for socalled book of mormon archaeology. Even today, the institute he founded hums with research. Archaeological and historical evidence evidences of the.
If you missed the bmaf messages announcing the change please go to and enter your email address. If the book is accurate, archaeologists would expect to find numerous pieces of hard evidence in central america that confirm the presence of these societies. Other people can use the explanation to justify that their religion hasnt been 100% disproved by evidence even if the explanation is somewhat weak in places. Book of mormon archaeology is real, authentic, scientifically researched, a proven fact. The only bible that joseph smith relied on was the king james version. The book of mormon is true and could have only happened in north america. The honest in heart, who feel that the true kingdom of god ought to have special and powerful credentials, and not just be another voice in the. The bibles claims, conservative protestant critics of mormonism often like to argue, are corroborated by geography and archaeology. John sorenson noted, the firstcenturybc appearance of cement in the book of mormon agrees strikingly with the archaeology of central mexico. Its early account of jerusalem just before the babylonian captivity gains in plausibility as research continues to accumulate. Book of mormon archaeology and anthropology byu studies. Archaeological evidence for the book of mormon book of.
Archaeological science versus claims of the book of mormon. This volume features articles on archaeological and anthropological aspects of the book of mormon, such as the use of the wheel in ancient america, hagoth and the polynesian tradition, the mulekites, ancient writing in the americas, and the use of metal. An online handbook to the lds church mormon the scientific study of historic or prehistoric peoples and their cultures by analysis of their artifacts, inscriptions, monuments, and other such remains, especially those that have been excavated. Welch pointed out that no archeologist in 1829 could have known how accurately the dating of this technological adaptation correlated with what was happening on the ground. The book of mormon is really there so one can have book of mormon studies, and archaeology is really there so one can study archaeology, but the two are not wed. This evidence has long been a topic of debate with most archaeologists concluding that the. Before delving into archaeological matters, it is helpful to take a step back and consider what archaeological evidence means in relation to the book of. This sub is for fellowship and faithful belief in the restored gospel of jesus christ ephesians 2. King domestic architecture and the new testament, by h. There are different things that are difficult to distinguish. Archaeology, relics and book of mormon belief deseret news.
Book of mormon archaeology the irrefutable evidence. As always, i invite you to study the issues, evaluate what we know and what we dont. Archaeological evidence of the book of mormon latterday. Is there archaeological evidence for the book of mormon. The volume has long invited scrutiny from all branches of science. These facts establish how plausible it is that the book of mormon really is an artifact of the ancient world. Undeniable archaeological evidence of the book of mormon. The new testament also has many archaeological proof of existence. Critics trot out this letter as proof that the book of mormon has no archaeological support and is therefore false. Welcome to rlatterdaysaints a gathering place for those supporting or investigating the church of jesus christ of latterday saints and its members.
One of the most competent and helpful evaluations of book of mormon archaeology is a paper delivered by brigham young university archaeology professor raymond t. A comparison of the archaeological evidence for the book of mormon with the evidence for the bible clearly shows the weakness of the mormon position. The book of mormon describes three migrations of people from the middle east to america. Jun 22, 2016 all opinions, speakers and presenters represent and express their own individual opinions, and not necessarily the opinions of firm foundation, book of mormon evidence, or its employees, and no information or opinions represent the church of jesus christ of latterday saints. Ever since scientific archaeology started a century and a half ago, the consistent pattern has been this. Therefore, the mormon can have confidence that the bible is the word of god and that it can be accurately translated. Welcome to the book of mormon archaeological forum. Feb 09, 2010 okay, im taking an old testament course at the mormon institute, and how it relates to the book of mormon. Keep a summary at archaeology and the book of mormon and consider this to be a parent article to the geographical theories possibly merge limited geography model book of mormon into it i do not want book of mormon geographical theories to just be an apologetic fork. The book of first nephi, the first book in the volume, describes the actions of lehi and his family in leaving jerusalem before its destruction, following the counsel of the lord, and wandering through the wilderness for several years before embarking on a transoceanic voyage to somewhere in or near central america. Undeniable archaeological evidence of the book of mormon in. The content of the book of mormon may be the most convincing evidence for its claim as a historical record and divine scripture.
People of all and any faiths are welcome here on the grounds of goodwill and faith. Archaeological and historical evidence where did the book. Jan 01, 2008 the journal of book of mormon studies is a scholarly journal devoted to the latest research on the book of mormon, including articles on the geography, names, terms, and events in the book of mormon, as well as archaeological finds in the old world and the new world. Uncle sams chin beard, however, is airbrushed into the shoulder. Prove the existence of zarahemla, for example, and the validity of the rest follows. Undeniable archaeological evidence of the book of mormon in north america.
Aug 16, 2009 we invite all people everywhere to read the book of mormon, to ponder in their hearts the message it contains, and then to ask god, the eternal father, in the name of christ, if the book is true. The book of mormon does fit into what we know of the ancient world. Kennedy archaeology and the book of esther carey a. Evidence, proof, and belief before delving into archaeological matters, it is helpful to take a step back and consider what archaeological evidence means in relation to the book of. Here you find the photographic, archaeological, and biblical. Full text of the world and thomas kelly internet archive. The smithsonian institution sends a form letter to those who inquire about their use of the book of mormon for archaeological purposes. His mission led him further and further from his faith, eventually sapping him of religious conviction entirely. Apr 28, 2017 it seems that book of mormon archaeology has shifted away from looking for the big discovery and towards building a nonfalsifiable explanation for the book of mormon peoples existence.
Excluding the bible and similar writing, can you prove to an atheist or to someone that is agnostic that god exists. Watch presentations about american archaeology and its parallels to the book of mormon civilizations. It follows that no amount of scrutiny of the book will ever betray josephs mind or heart because it is not mirrored in the text. The first of these peoples, called jaredites, are supposed to have. Archaeology and the book of esther andrews university. While mormon scholars admit valid challenges to mormonism from archaeology and the book of abraham, they say the evidences of mormonisms truthfulness is the book of mormon itself, gods confirmation in your spirit, and the number of changed lives. Book of mormon thought false by lds memberarchaelogist.
Both the bible and the book of mormon declare themselves to be ancient, historical, and reliable rules of faiththe very word of god. Jan, 2016 undeniable archaeological evidence of the book of mormon in north america. Nonmormon archaeologists speak on book of mormon evidence. Mormon cultural belief regarding book of mormon archaeology archaeological evidence of large populations. The scientific legacy of a quest to prove the book of mormon. No direct geographical, archaeological or any other scientific field supports fictional narratives. Moore archaeology at the albrigh institutet by phili, p j. A contemporary mormon view is that these civilizations rose and fell in mesoamerica. It seems misplaced endnote 20, continuing from endnote 19 in part 2. Considered the first of the biblical patriarchs, abrahams life history encompasses a journey starts that in a place called ur. The book of mormon the book of mormon claims to be a volume of holy scripture comparable to the bible. Decades of desperate archaeological research in mexico and central america, often they say. This compilation of groundbreaking book of mormon articles is selected from over fifty years of lds scholarship published by byu studies.
Mormonism is there any archaeological evidence for the. Videos watch past wayne may presentations as he reveals the supporting evidences of the book of mormon as found in archaeology, geography and historical records. In the last chapter we saw that the bible is reliable, being textually pure and verifiably accurate in many places. Weve found the empires, places, and technology found in various places the bible support. Civilizations of their magnitude and duration would be expected to leave extensive archaeological. The likelihood of such a setting was greatly strengthened by john l. Ferguson placed his faith in the hands of science, not realizing they were the lions jaws. For example, critics of mormonism have shown convincing proof that the book of mormon is a synthesis of earlier works written by other men, of the vivid imaginings of joseph smith, and of plagiarisms from the king james bible. First, it is a coauthored paper with wade ardern and matthew roper. Ernest wright early christians and the anchor, by charles a. It just doesnt seem to fit anything in anthropology or history.
993 1446 393 40 871 134 632 817 8 169 1176 1076 218 51 1551 899 215 561 847 13 962 903 1145 899 828 897 412 375 250 842 1214 847 110 464 322 1051 259